Review



mouse anti bcl6  (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)


Bioz Verified Symbol Santa Cruz Biotechnology is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse anti bcl6
    Mouse Anti Bcl6, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 336 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+bcl6/Bcl-6/pm41025654-741-6-8
    Average 94 stars, based on 336 article reviews
    mouse anti bcl6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    94/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    93
    Miltenyi Biotec bcl6 pe
    Bcl6 Pe, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+bcl6/Bcl-6+Antibody%2C+anti-human%2Fmouse%2C+REAfinity/pmc13125213-123-8-12
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    bcl6 pe - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    R&D Systems anti human bcl6 goat antibody in pbs
    Anti Human Bcl6 Goat Antibody In Pbs, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+bcl6/Human%2FMouse+Bcl-6+Antibody/us12528826-669-15-21
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti human bcl6 goat antibody in pbs - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    OriGene bcl6
    Bcl6, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+bcl6/bcl+6+(BCL6)+Mouse+Monoclonal+Antibody/pm41225534-111-31-47
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    bcl6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse anti bcl6
    Mouse Anti Bcl6, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+bcl6/Bcl-6/pm41025654-741-6-8
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti bcl6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Novus Biologicals anti mouse cd4 polyclonal af647 novus nbp3 18057af647 anti mouse bcl6 ig191e a8 af594 biolegend 648308 rb anti mouse cxcr5
    Anti Mouse Cd4 Polyclonal Af647 Novus Nbp3 18057af647 Anti Mouse Bcl6 Ig191e A8 Af594 Biolegend 648308 Rb Anti Mouse Cxcr5, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+bcl6/CD4+Antibody+%5BAlexa+Fluor%C2%AE+647%5D/pm40910688-254-8-12
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti mouse cd4 polyclonal af647 novus nbp3 18057af647 anti mouse bcl6 ig191e a8 af594 biolegend 648308 rb anti mouse cxcr5 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Miltenyi Biotec bcl6 apc
    Bcl6 Apc, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+bcl6/Bcl-6+Antibody%2C+anti-human%2Fmouse%2C+REAfinity/pmc12377736__pnas%2E2425081122%2Esapp-130-37-40
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    bcl6 apc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Miltenyi Biotec hgbcl dh bcl2 bcl6
    IGH silencing in GCB DLBCL and HGBCL-DH- <t>BCL2</t> . A, Class-specific IGH IHC analysis of representative DLBCL cases ( n = 258), including an IGH UND case (last row). CD20 expression and scattered IGH immunoreactivity from infiltrating plasma cells act as internal staining controls. B, Distribution of IGH + and IGH UND lymphomas among consecutive DLBCL cases ( n = 258). The IGH UND group includes a fraction of IGH UND/+ mixed lymphomas. Numbers inside bars indicate frequencies. C, IGH IHC matched to FACS measurements of surface IGK, IGL, and CD79B expression in representative IGH + and IGH UND DLBCL ( n = 30). Tumor B cells are labeled in blue. CD20 − non-B cells (gray) act as negative controls. D, Frequencies of IGH + and IGH UND cases among DLBCLs grouped for COO according to the Hans algorithm. Numbers above histograms refer to cases. E, Frequencies of IGH + and IGH UND cases among HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( <t>-BCL6</t> ) and GCB DLBCL NOS cases. Number of cases is indicated above histograms. F, Class-specific IGH, MYC, and BCL2 IHC in representative IGH + and IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( n = 104) with rare infiltrating plasma cells acting as internal IGH staining control. G, Flow cytometric analysis for surface IGK and IGL expression in a case of IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 . Percentage of gated tumor (red) and normal (blue) B cells are shown. H, Frequencies of IGH + and IGH UND cases among HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( -BCL6 ) in a cohort of n = 104 nonconsecutive cases. The IGH UND group includes a minor fraction of IGH UND/+ lymphomas (blue). I, Frequencies of IGH + and IGH UND cases among GCB MB2 DE DLBCLs, grouped according to the presence (HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ) or absence (non-HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ) of BCL2 and MYC rearrangements. Number of cases is indicated above histograms. Scale bars, 20 μm ( A ), 100 μm ( C ), and 80 μm ( F ). Insets in ( F ) refers to sections photographed at low (top left, 3.8 and 7 mm scale bars in the IGH + and IGH UND panels, respectively) and high (top right, 10 μm scale bar) magnification. P values ( D and I ) were determined by the Fisher exact test: **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.
    Hgbcl Dh Bcl2 Bcl6, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+bcl6/Bcl-6+Antibody%2C+anti-human%2Fmouse%2C+REAfinity/pmc12209767-357-7-18
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hgbcl dh bcl2 bcl6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    fluidigm bcl6 163dy k112
    FIGURE 3 | Differential localisation and distribution profile among TFH cell subsets. (A) Representative fluorescent images showing the expres- sion of CD20 (red), Ki67 (magenta) and <t>Bcl6</t> (grey) in tonsillar follicles (scale bar: 300 μm). (B) 2D plots showing the expression of Ki67 vs. Bcl6 in total follicular (F) area from one tonsil and the corresponding localisation of F-CD20hi/dimCD3loKi67loBCl6lo (blue-MZ), F-CD20hi/dimCD3loKi67hiBCl6hi (magenta-DZ) and F-CD20hi/dimCD3loKi67loBCl6hi (grey-LZ) (left). The relevant B cell subsets and their localisation for one representative follicle are also shown (right). (C) 2D plots showing the gating for the identification of B subsets (based on the expression of Ki67 and Bcl6) and CD3hiPD1hi TFH cell subsets (based on the expression of CD57, CXCR3, TIGIT and Bcl6) as well as their localisation across the areas of individual follicles (data from one LN). (D) Dot plot graphs showing accumulated data for the analysis of the minimum distance between DZ (CD20hi/dimCD3loKi67hiBcl- 6hi) (open and blue circles) or LZ (CD20hi/dimCD3loKi67loBcl6hi) (green and red circles) B cells and TFH cell subsets (CD3hiPD1hiCD57loCXCR3hi, CD3hiPD1hiCD57hiCXCR3lo) (upper panel) and the corresponding calculated cross-G function (lower panel). Follicular areas from two tonsils and two LNs were analysed, each dot represents a follicle. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon and Mann–Whitney tests, and p values are listed.
    Bcl6 163dy K112, supplied by fluidigm, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+bcl6/Anti-Human%2FMouse+BCL-6+(K112-91)-163Dy/pm40421691-58-28-32
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    bcl6 163dy k112 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti mouse bcl6
    FIGURE 3 | Differential localisation and distribution profile among TFH cell subsets. (A) Representative fluorescent images showing the expres- sion of CD20 (red), Ki67 (magenta) and <t>Bcl6</t> (grey) in tonsillar follicles (scale bar: 300 μm). (B) 2D plots showing the expression of Ki67 vs. Bcl6 in total follicular (F) area from one tonsil and the corresponding localisation of F-CD20hi/dimCD3loKi67loBCl6lo (blue-MZ), F-CD20hi/dimCD3loKi67hiBCl6hi (magenta-DZ) and F-CD20hi/dimCD3loKi67loBCl6hi (grey-LZ) (left). The relevant B cell subsets and their localisation for one representative follicle are also shown (right). (C) 2D plots showing the gating for the identification of B subsets (based on the expression of Ki67 and Bcl6) and CD3hiPD1hi TFH cell subsets (based on the expression of CD57, CXCR3, TIGIT and Bcl6) as well as their localisation across the areas of individual follicles (data from one LN). (D) Dot plot graphs showing accumulated data for the analysis of the minimum distance between DZ (CD20hi/dimCD3loKi67hiBcl- 6hi) (open and blue circles) or LZ (CD20hi/dimCD3loKi67loBcl6hi) (green and red circles) B cells and TFH cell subsets (CD3hiPD1hiCD57loCXCR3hi, CD3hiPD1hiCD57hiCXCR3lo) (upper panel) and the corresponding calculated cross-G function (lower panel). Follicular areas from two tonsils and two LNs were analysed, each dot represents a follicle. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon and Mann–Whitney tests, and p values are listed.
    Anti Mouse Bcl6, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+bcl6/BCL6+Antibody/pm39729992-934-0-2
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti mouse bcl6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    IGH silencing in GCB DLBCL and HGBCL-DH- BCL2 . A, Class-specific IGH IHC analysis of representative DLBCL cases ( n = 258), including an IGH UND case (last row). CD20 expression and scattered IGH immunoreactivity from infiltrating plasma cells act as internal staining controls. B, Distribution of IGH + and IGH UND lymphomas among consecutive DLBCL cases ( n = 258). The IGH UND group includes a fraction of IGH UND/+ mixed lymphomas. Numbers inside bars indicate frequencies. C, IGH IHC matched to FACS measurements of surface IGK, IGL, and CD79B expression in representative IGH + and IGH UND DLBCL ( n = 30). Tumor B cells are labeled in blue. CD20 − non-B cells (gray) act as negative controls. D, Frequencies of IGH + and IGH UND cases among DLBCLs grouped for COO according to the Hans algorithm. Numbers above histograms refer to cases. E, Frequencies of IGH + and IGH UND cases among HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( -BCL6 ) and GCB DLBCL NOS cases. Number of cases is indicated above histograms. F, Class-specific IGH, MYC, and BCL2 IHC in representative IGH + and IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( n = 104) with rare infiltrating plasma cells acting as internal IGH staining control. G, Flow cytometric analysis for surface IGK and IGL expression in a case of IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 . Percentage of gated tumor (red) and normal (blue) B cells are shown. H, Frequencies of IGH + and IGH UND cases among HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( -BCL6 ) in a cohort of n = 104 nonconsecutive cases. The IGH UND group includes a minor fraction of IGH UND/+ lymphomas (blue). I, Frequencies of IGH + and IGH UND cases among GCB MB2 DE DLBCLs, grouped according to the presence (HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ) or absence (non-HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ) of BCL2 and MYC rearrangements. Number of cases is indicated above histograms. Scale bars, 20 μm ( A ), 100 μm ( C ), and 80 μm ( F ). Insets in ( F ) refers to sections photographed at low (top left, 3.8 and 7 mm scale bars in the IGH + and IGH UND panels, respectively) and high (top right, 10 μm scale bar) magnification. P values ( D and I ) were determined by the Fisher exact test: **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.

    Journal: Blood Cancer Discovery

    Article Title: B-cell Receptor Silencing Reveals the Origin and Dependencies of High-Grade B-cell Lymphomas with MYC and BCL2 Rearrangements

    doi: 10.1158/2643-3230.BCD-25-0099

    Figure Lengend Snippet: IGH silencing in GCB DLBCL and HGBCL-DH- BCL2 . A, Class-specific IGH IHC analysis of representative DLBCL cases ( n = 258), including an IGH UND case (last row). CD20 expression and scattered IGH immunoreactivity from infiltrating plasma cells act as internal staining controls. B, Distribution of IGH + and IGH UND lymphomas among consecutive DLBCL cases ( n = 258). The IGH UND group includes a fraction of IGH UND/+ mixed lymphomas. Numbers inside bars indicate frequencies. C, IGH IHC matched to FACS measurements of surface IGK, IGL, and CD79B expression in representative IGH + and IGH UND DLBCL ( n = 30). Tumor B cells are labeled in blue. CD20 − non-B cells (gray) act as negative controls. D, Frequencies of IGH + and IGH UND cases among DLBCLs grouped for COO according to the Hans algorithm. Numbers above histograms refer to cases. E, Frequencies of IGH + and IGH UND cases among HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( -BCL6 ) and GCB DLBCL NOS cases. Number of cases is indicated above histograms. F, Class-specific IGH, MYC, and BCL2 IHC in representative IGH + and IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( n = 104) with rare infiltrating plasma cells acting as internal IGH staining control. G, Flow cytometric analysis for surface IGK and IGL expression in a case of IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 . Percentage of gated tumor (red) and normal (blue) B cells are shown. H, Frequencies of IGH + and IGH UND cases among HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( -BCL6 ) in a cohort of n = 104 nonconsecutive cases. The IGH UND group includes a minor fraction of IGH UND/+ lymphomas (blue). I, Frequencies of IGH + and IGH UND cases among GCB MB2 DE DLBCLs, grouped according to the presence (HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ) or absence (non-HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ) of BCL2 and MYC rearrangements. Number of cases is indicated above histograms. Scale bars, 20 μm ( A ), 100 μm ( C ), and 80 μm ( F ). Insets in ( F ) refers to sections photographed at low (top left, 3.8 and 7 mm scale bars in the IGH + and IGH UND panels, respectively) and high (top right, 10 μm scale bar) magnification. P values ( D and I ) were determined by the Fisher exact test: **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: Multiplex IF analysis on FFPE sections of HGBCL-DH- BCL2 (- BCL6 ) was performed using the MACSima platform (Miltenyi), with antibodies listed in Supplementary Table S7.

    Techniques: Expressing, Clinical Proteomics, Staining, Labeling, Control

    IGH + and IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 differ in GC zone programs and immune infiltrate. A, Unsupervised clustering of GCB MB2 DE DLBCL cases ( n = 22) based on whole transcriptome data, excluding IGH transcripts. Case ID is listed at the bottom. Clustering mostly separates IGH + (black; P = 0.0004) from IGH UND (red; P = 0.0170) tumors. IGH UND/+ cases (blue) clustered with the IGH UND group. B, Heatmap of differentially expressed genes ( n = 953; log 2 FC > 0.58: adjusted P < 0.05) between IGH + and IGH UND MB2 DE DLBCLs after unsupervised clustering, defining the IGH UND MB2 signature. IGH and HGBCL-DH- BCL2 status are indicated above the heatmap. Z -score normalized expression values are shown. C, Boxplot of median MYC transcript levels (horizontal line) and 5th–95th percentile (whiskers) in GCB MB2 DE DLBCLs ( n = 22) clustered according to IGH status. D, Unsupervised clustering of MB2 DE DLBCL cases for selected genes respectively up- (top map) and down-regulated (bottom map) in IGH UND compared with the IGH + subset, grouped according to gene ontology. E, Volcano plot representation of differentially expressed genes (log 2 FC > 0.58: adjusted P < 0.05) between ROIs (circles, n = 3) of IGH UND and IGH + HGBCL-DH- BCL2 . Top differentially expressed genes are shown. IGM (together with IGD/G/A not shown) IHC on serial sections served to assess IGH status. F, CD3 IHC analysis in representative IGH + and IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 (- BCL6 ). Histograms summarize the mean number of CD3 + cells/mm 2 ± SD in IGH + ( n = 22) and IGH UND ( n = 33) cases. Each circle represents a case. G, Multiplex IF analysis of FFPE sections of IGH + and IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 , stained for macrophages (CD68) and B (CD20), T (CD4 and CD8A), NK (CD57), and endothelial (CD31) cell markers. H, Unsupervised clustering of IGH + and IGH UND MB2 DE DLBCL cases ( n = 22) for spatially resolved GC DZ/LZ signatures. Heatmap identifies genes preferentially expressed in DZ (red) or LZ (green) regions. IGH and HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( -BCL6 ) status is indicated above the heatmap. I, Unsupervised clustering of IGH + and IGH UND MB2 DE DLBCL cases ( n = 22) according to the DHIT/DZ molecular signature. Transcripts positively (red) and negatively (green) associated with the DHIT/DZ signature are indicated. P values were determined by unpaired t test with the Welch correction ( C and F ): *, P < 0.05. FC, fold change, norm, normal.

    Journal: Blood Cancer Discovery

    Article Title: B-cell Receptor Silencing Reveals the Origin and Dependencies of High-Grade B-cell Lymphomas with MYC and BCL2 Rearrangements

    doi: 10.1158/2643-3230.BCD-25-0099

    Figure Lengend Snippet: IGH + and IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 differ in GC zone programs and immune infiltrate. A, Unsupervised clustering of GCB MB2 DE DLBCL cases ( n = 22) based on whole transcriptome data, excluding IGH transcripts. Case ID is listed at the bottom. Clustering mostly separates IGH + (black; P = 0.0004) from IGH UND (red; P = 0.0170) tumors. IGH UND/+ cases (blue) clustered with the IGH UND group. B, Heatmap of differentially expressed genes ( n = 953; log 2 FC > 0.58: adjusted P < 0.05) between IGH + and IGH UND MB2 DE DLBCLs after unsupervised clustering, defining the IGH UND MB2 signature. IGH and HGBCL-DH- BCL2 status are indicated above the heatmap. Z -score normalized expression values are shown. C, Boxplot of median MYC transcript levels (horizontal line) and 5th–95th percentile (whiskers) in GCB MB2 DE DLBCLs ( n = 22) clustered according to IGH status. D, Unsupervised clustering of MB2 DE DLBCL cases for selected genes respectively up- (top map) and down-regulated (bottom map) in IGH UND compared with the IGH + subset, grouped according to gene ontology. E, Volcano plot representation of differentially expressed genes (log 2 FC > 0.58: adjusted P < 0.05) between ROIs (circles, n = 3) of IGH UND and IGH + HGBCL-DH- BCL2 . Top differentially expressed genes are shown. IGM (together with IGD/G/A not shown) IHC on serial sections served to assess IGH status. F, CD3 IHC analysis in representative IGH + and IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 (- BCL6 ). Histograms summarize the mean number of CD3 + cells/mm 2 ± SD in IGH + ( n = 22) and IGH UND ( n = 33) cases. Each circle represents a case. G, Multiplex IF analysis of FFPE sections of IGH + and IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 , stained for macrophages (CD68) and B (CD20), T (CD4 and CD8A), NK (CD57), and endothelial (CD31) cell markers. H, Unsupervised clustering of IGH + and IGH UND MB2 DE DLBCL cases ( n = 22) for spatially resolved GC DZ/LZ signatures. Heatmap identifies genes preferentially expressed in DZ (red) or LZ (green) regions. IGH and HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( -BCL6 ) status is indicated above the heatmap. I, Unsupervised clustering of IGH + and IGH UND MB2 DE DLBCL cases ( n = 22) according to the DHIT/DZ molecular signature. Transcripts positively (red) and negatively (green) associated with the DHIT/DZ signature are indicated. P values were determined by unpaired t test with the Welch correction ( C and F ): *, P < 0.05. FC, fold change, norm, normal.

    Article Snippet: Multiplex IF analysis on FFPE sections of HGBCL-DH- BCL2 (- BCL6 ) was performed using the MACSima platform (Miltenyi), with antibodies listed in Supplementary Table S7.

    Techniques: Expressing, Multiplex Assay, Staining

    Mutational signatures in IGH + and IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 (- BCL6 ). A, Nonsynonymous SNVs for selected genes in IGH + and IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 (- BCL6 ; n = 12). Colors indicate gene variant features. B, Total number of single-nucleotide substitutions in IGHV rearrangements of HGBCL-DH- BCL2 (- BCL6 ), PB, and rLN B cell clones, counted by IgTreeZ-MTree. C, Minimum root-to-leaf path corresponding to the minimum number of mutations per sequence in IGHV rearrangements of HGBCL-DH- BCL2 , PB, and rLN B-cell clones, measured by IgTreeZ-MTree. D, Representative lineage tree of an IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 clone. Yellow filled nodes represent sampled sequences. Numbers on edges indicate numbers of mutations between nodes; edges without a number represent one mutation. A lineage tree from a healthy GC B-cell clone is included for comparison. E, Numbers of leaves per dominant clone for the indicated (IGH UND and IGH + ) HGBCL-DH- BCL2 and control (iLN and PB) samples, counted by IgTreeZ-MTree. F, Average number of children per node for the indicated tumoral and control samples counted by IgTreeZ-MTree. G, Mean and confidence intervals of selection scores (Σ) for CDR and FRW regions of clonal IGHV rearrangements from HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( -BCL6 ) cases ( n = 20), antigen-selected PB B cells and rLN B cells from healthy donors, as calculated by BASELINe. Selection scores were also calculated for clonal rearrangements of HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( -BCL6 )-associated nonmalignant B cells (NmB). Nonproductive (Np) IGHV rearrangements from healthy GC-experienced B-cell clones were included in the analyses as nonselected controls. H, Stacked bar histogram representing frequency of IGH + and IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 (- BCL6 ) cases acquiring N-linked glycosylation motifs within clonal IGHV rearrangements. Numbers above histogram indicate cases. P values were determined by the Mann–Whitney U test with Benjamini–Hochberg correction for multiple comparisons ( B , C , E , and F ): *, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.001; ns, not significant.

    Journal: Blood Cancer Discovery

    Article Title: B-cell Receptor Silencing Reveals the Origin and Dependencies of High-Grade B-cell Lymphomas with MYC and BCL2 Rearrangements

    doi: 10.1158/2643-3230.BCD-25-0099

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Mutational signatures in IGH + and IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 (- BCL6 ). A, Nonsynonymous SNVs for selected genes in IGH + and IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 (- BCL6 ; n = 12). Colors indicate gene variant features. B, Total number of single-nucleotide substitutions in IGHV rearrangements of HGBCL-DH- BCL2 (- BCL6 ), PB, and rLN B cell clones, counted by IgTreeZ-MTree. C, Minimum root-to-leaf path corresponding to the minimum number of mutations per sequence in IGHV rearrangements of HGBCL-DH- BCL2 , PB, and rLN B-cell clones, measured by IgTreeZ-MTree. D, Representative lineage tree of an IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 clone. Yellow filled nodes represent sampled sequences. Numbers on edges indicate numbers of mutations between nodes; edges without a number represent one mutation. A lineage tree from a healthy GC B-cell clone is included for comparison. E, Numbers of leaves per dominant clone for the indicated (IGH UND and IGH + ) HGBCL-DH- BCL2 and control (iLN and PB) samples, counted by IgTreeZ-MTree. F, Average number of children per node for the indicated tumoral and control samples counted by IgTreeZ-MTree. G, Mean and confidence intervals of selection scores (Σ) for CDR and FRW regions of clonal IGHV rearrangements from HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( -BCL6 ) cases ( n = 20), antigen-selected PB B cells and rLN B cells from healthy donors, as calculated by BASELINe. Selection scores were also calculated for clonal rearrangements of HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( -BCL6 )-associated nonmalignant B cells (NmB). Nonproductive (Np) IGHV rearrangements from healthy GC-experienced B-cell clones were included in the analyses as nonselected controls. H, Stacked bar histogram representing frequency of IGH + and IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 (- BCL6 ) cases acquiring N-linked glycosylation motifs within clonal IGHV rearrangements. Numbers above histogram indicate cases. P values were determined by the Mann–Whitney U test with Benjamini–Hochberg correction for multiple comparisons ( B , C , E , and F ): *, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.001; ns, not significant.

    Article Snippet: Multiplex IF analysis on FFPE sections of HGBCL-DH- BCL2 (- BCL6 ) was performed using the MACSima platform (Miltenyi), with antibodies listed in Supplementary Table S7.

    Techniques: Variant Assay, Clone Assay, Sequencing, Mutagenesis, Comparison, Control, Selection, Glycoproteomics, MANN-WHITNEY

    IGH silencing is restricted to IGH-isotype switched HGBCL-DH- BCL2 . A, Box plot representation of median and 5th–95th percentile (whiskers) of class-specific IGH constant region transcript levels in IGH + (white, n = 4) and IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 (gray, n = 10), measured by RNA-seq. B, Most abundant class-specific IGH constant region gene transcript levels in representative IGH + (left) and IGH UND (right) HGBCL-DH- BCL2 , quantified by RNA-seq. C, In situ detection of class-specific IGH protein (IHC) and transcripts (RNA-scope) in representative IGH + (top) and IGH UND (middle and bottom) HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( -BCL6 ; n = 34). D, Frequency of HGBCL-DH- BCL2 (- BCL6 ; n = 36) analyzed by RNA-scope and/or RNA-seq, divided according to IGH isotype choice. Central number refers to cases analyzed. E, Stacked histograms representing frequency of cases expressing IGHM or IGH -switched transcripts among IGH + and IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 (- BCL6 ; n = 36). F, Normalized IGHM GCN in representative IGH + ( n = 3; gray circles) and IGH UND ( n = 8; green triangles) HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( -BCL6 ), measured by genomic qPCR. A pool of FACS-sorted IGM + circulating B cells (red circle) from n = 1 donor controlled for two IGHM gene copies. G, CD79B IHC in representative IGH + and IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 . Histograms summarize CD79B distribution scores in HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( -BCL6 ; n = 49), discriminating intracellular (IC) from plasma membrane (M) immunoreactivity. H, Reduced CD79B protein levels in representative IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( -BCL6 ; n = 30, bottom) as compared with IGH + ( n = 19, top) counterparts, measured by IHC. I, IGG/CD79B (left) or IGG/CD79A (right) protein complexes in one IGG-switched IGH + DLBCL (top) and in two IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( -BCL6 ; middle/bottom), measured by PLA. Insets represent sections photographed at high magnification. Histograms indicate mean frequency (±SEM) of PLA + lymphoma cells in n = 5 independent fields of view (black circles). CD79B/IGG complexes quantified in GC DZ and LZ areas served as reference. J, IGH IHC ( n = 17) and in situ RNA analyses ( n = 16) for representative IGH + (top) and IGH UND (middle/bottom) FL-HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( -BCL6 ) metachronous specimens. K, Correspondence of IGH class choice between FL and metachronous/synchronous HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( -BCL6 ) cases, assessed by IHC (left) and RNA-scope (right). Numbers above histograms refer to cases. Scale bars, 20 μm ( C , H , and J ), 10 μm ( G ), 100 μm ( I ), and 10 μm for all insets ( I ). P values were determined by an unpaired t test ( A and F ) or Fisher exact test ( E and G ): *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.

    Journal: Blood Cancer Discovery

    Article Title: B-cell Receptor Silencing Reveals the Origin and Dependencies of High-Grade B-cell Lymphomas with MYC and BCL2 Rearrangements

    doi: 10.1158/2643-3230.BCD-25-0099

    Figure Lengend Snippet: IGH silencing is restricted to IGH-isotype switched HGBCL-DH- BCL2 . A, Box plot representation of median and 5th–95th percentile (whiskers) of class-specific IGH constant region transcript levels in IGH + (white, n = 4) and IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 (gray, n = 10), measured by RNA-seq. B, Most abundant class-specific IGH constant region gene transcript levels in representative IGH + (left) and IGH UND (right) HGBCL-DH- BCL2 , quantified by RNA-seq. C, In situ detection of class-specific IGH protein (IHC) and transcripts (RNA-scope) in representative IGH + (top) and IGH UND (middle and bottom) HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( -BCL6 ; n = 34). D, Frequency of HGBCL-DH- BCL2 (- BCL6 ; n = 36) analyzed by RNA-scope and/or RNA-seq, divided according to IGH isotype choice. Central number refers to cases analyzed. E, Stacked histograms representing frequency of cases expressing IGHM or IGH -switched transcripts among IGH + and IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 (- BCL6 ; n = 36). F, Normalized IGHM GCN in representative IGH + ( n = 3; gray circles) and IGH UND ( n = 8; green triangles) HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( -BCL6 ), measured by genomic qPCR. A pool of FACS-sorted IGM + circulating B cells (red circle) from n = 1 donor controlled for two IGHM gene copies. G, CD79B IHC in representative IGH + and IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 . Histograms summarize CD79B distribution scores in HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( -BCL6 ; n = 49), discriminating intracellular (IC) from plasma membrane (M) immunoreactivity. H, Reduced CD79B protein levels in representative IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( -BCL6 ; n = 30, bottom) as compared with IGH + ( n = 19, top) counterparts, measured by IHC. I, IGG/CD79B (left) or IGG/CD79A (right) protein complexes in one IGG-switched IGH + DLBCL (top) and in two IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( -BCL6 ; middle/bottom), measured by PLA. Insets represent sections photographed at high magnification. Histograms indicate mean frequency (±SEM) of PLA + lymphoma cells in n = 5 independent fields of view (black circles). CD79B/IGG complexes quantified in GC DZ and LZ areas served as reference. J, IGH IHC ( n = 17) and in situ RNA analyses ( n = 16) for representative IGH + (top) and IGH UND (middle/bottom) FL-HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( -BCL6 ) metachronous specimens. K, Correspondence of IGH class choice between FL and metachronous/synchronous HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( -BCL6 ) cases, assessed by IHC (left) and RNA-scope (right). Numbers above histograms refer to cases. Scale bars, 20 μm ( C , H , and J ), 10 μm ( G ), 100 μm ( I ), and 10 μm for all insets ( I ). P values were determined by an unpaired t test ( A and F ) or Fisher exact test ( E and G ): *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.

    Article Snippet: Multiplex IF analysis on FFPE sections of HGBCL-DH- BCL2 (- BCL6 ) was performed using the MACSima platform (Miltenyi), with antibodies listed in Supplementary Table S7.

    Techniques: RNA Sequencing, In Situ, RNAscope, Expressing, Clinical Proteomics, Membrane

    RAG1/2 involvement in IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 genesis. A, Evolutionary trajectory of three metachronous FL-HGBCL-DH- BCL2 (- BCL6 ) pairs, reconstructed on the bases of shared and private IGHV amino acid substitutions. Acquired N-glycosylation motifs are labeled in red. B, Frequency of cases with IGH mono and biallelic locus disruption in IGH + and IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( -BCL6 ; n = 22). C, Frequency of IGH :: BCL2 (black bar) and IGH :: MYC (blue bar) rearrangements in representative IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( -BCL6 ) with monoallelic or biallelic IGH disruption. Cases with non-IGH :: MYC translocations are included (gray bars). Numbers below histograms refer to cases analyzed. D, IGH protein (IHC) and transcript (RNA) detection in IGH UND IGG-switched, FL (FL#1), and HGBCL-DH- BCL2 - BCL6 (#245) metachronous specimens. In FL, IGHD transcripts mark the mantle zone, whereas tumor cells express IGHG and IGHA transcripts. The metachronous HGBCL-DH- BCL2 - BCL6 becomes IGHG -restricted. E, In situ detection of RAG1/2 transcripts in HGBCL-DH- BCL2 - BCL6 (#245) and in a representative control rLN ( n = 4), measured by RNA-scope. Histogram bars indicate mean frequency (±SEM) of RAG1/2 + cells measured in n = 5 fields of view of HGBCL-DH- BCL2 - BCL6 #245. F, Summary of RAG1/2 transcript analysis in IGH + and IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( n = 37), measured by RNA-scope. Tumors with >20% of RAG1/2-expressing cells were scored positive. G, IGK/LC transcripts captured by RNA scope in FFPE sections of representative IGH + and IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 . Histograms summarize frequencies of IGKC- (gray) and IGLC - (black) expressing cases ( n = 40), among IGH + and IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 . Numbers above histograms refer to cases. Scale bars, 20 μm ( D and H ), 50 μm ( E ), and 10 μm within insets ( E ). P values determined by Fisher exact test ( G ): **, P < 0.01.

    Journal: Blood Cancer Discovery

    Article Title: B-cell Receptor Silencing Reveals the Origin and Dependencies of High-Grade B-cell Lymphomas with MYC and BCL2 Rearrangements

    doi: 10.1158/2643-3230.BCD-25-0099

    Figure Lengend Snippet: RAG1/2 involvement in IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 genesis. A, Evolutionary trajectory of three metachronous FL-HGBCL-DH- BCL2 (- BCL6 ) pairs, reconstructed on the bases of shared and private IGHV amino acid substitutions. Acquired N-glycosylation motifs are labeled in red. B, Frequency of cases with IGH mono and biallelic locus disruption in IGH + and IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( -BCL6 ; n = 22). C, Frequency of IGH :: BCL2 (black bar) and IGH :: MYC (blue bar) rearrangements in representative IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( -BCL6 ) with monoallelic or biallelic IGH disruption. Cases with non-IGH :: MYC translocations are included (gray bars). Numbers below histograms refer to cases analyzed. D, IGH protein (IHC) and transcript (RNA) detection in IGH UND IGG-switched, FL (FL#1), and HGBCL-DH- BCL2 - BCL6 (#245) metachronous specimens. In FL, IGHD transcripts mark the mantle zone, whereas tumor cells express IGHG and IGHA transcripts. The metachronous HGBCL-DH- BCL2 - BCL6 becomes IGHG -restricted. E, In situ detection of RAG1/2 transcripts in HGBCL-DH- BCL2 - BCL6 (#245) and in a representative control rLN ( n = 4), measured by RNA-scope. Histogram bars indicate mean frequency (±SEM) of RAG1/2 + cells measured in n = 5 fields of view of HGBCL-DH- BCL2 - BCL6 #245. F, Summary of RAG1/2 transcript analysis in IGH + and IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 ( n = 37), measured by RNA-scope. Tumors with >20% of RAG1/2-expressing cells were scored positive. G, IGK/LC transcripts captured by RNA scope in FFPE sections of representative IGH + and IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 . Histograms summarize frequencies of IGKC- (gray) and IGLC - (black) expressing cases ( n = 40), among IGH + and IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 . Numbers above histograms refer to cases. Scale bars, 20 μm ( D and H ), 50 μm ( E ), and 10 μm within insets ( E ). P values determined by Fisher exact test ( G ): **, P < 0.01.

    Article Snippet: Multiplex IF analysis on FFPE sections of HGBCL-DH- BCL2 (- BCL6 ) was performed using the MACSima platform (Miltenyi), with antibodies listed in Supplementary Table S7.

    Techniques: Glycoproteomics, Labeling, Disruption, RNA Detection, In Situ, Control, RNAscope, Expressing

    IG light chain editing fuels BCR diversity and ultimate extinction in IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 models. A, Representative sIGK/L FACS analysis of IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 COH-DHL1 cells. Cell frequencies are indicated. B, Genomic PCR amplification of a segment of the IGKC gene (top) in COH-DHL1 cells, 293T cells, and PB mononuclear cells (PBMC). Amplification of the RPLP0 gene controlled for DNA input. Genomic PCR for the KDE rearrangement was performed on the same sample set (bottom). The asterisk refers to a nonspecific PCR amplification product serving as internal loading control. C, Longitudinal monitoring of IGM (IHC) and IGKC/LC (scale bar, 20 μm) and RAG1/2 (RNA-scope) expression (scale bar, 50 and 20 μm in the inset) in the HGBCL-DH- BCL2 - BCL6 case from which the COH-THL1 cell line model was established, analyzed at diagnosis (#329A) and after relapse (#329B). D, Representative IGM/IGK/IGL FACS analysis of low-passage COH-THL1 cells before (left plot) and after (middle and right plots) gating on the indicated subsets. Numbers indicate cell frequencies. E, Representative ( n = 5) sIGK/L FACS analysis of COH-THL1 bulk cultures before (left), at the time of sorting of IGH UND variants (middle) and after 2 weeks of in vitro culture (right) of the latter cells. Numbers indicate cell frequencies. F, Longitudinal tracking of sIGK/L expression of COH-THL1 cells profiled 2 weeks after consecutive rounds of FACS sorting for sBCR null cells. Note the progressive erosion of sIGK/L + cells at the expense of sIGK/L null cells. G, Normalized RAG1/2 transcript levels in IGH UND COH-DHL1 and COH-THL1 cells relative to 697 pre-B leukemia cells, measured by qRT-PCR. HEK293T cells were included as negative controls. H, Normalized RAG1/2 transcripts in FACS-purified IGH + and IGH UND COH-THL1 cells, quantified by RT-PCR. I, Quantitative measurement of RAG1/2 transcripts in the indicated HGBCL-DH- BCL2 (- BCL6 ) lymphoma lines, treated for 48 hours with the PI3Kδ/γ inhibitor duvelisib or FOXO1 inhibitor AS1842856. Transcripts are normalized to RPLP0 and represented as relative to the vehicle control set at 1 (dashed line). Data represent n = 6 ( A and D ) n = 5 ( E ), and n = 3 ( B , G , and H ) experiments.

    Journal: Blood Cancer Discovery

    Article Title: B-cell Receptor Silencing Reveals the Origin and Dependencies of High-Grade B-cell Lymphomas with MYC and BCL2 Rearrangements

    doi: 10.1158/2643-3230.BCD-25-0099

    Figure Lengend Snippet: IG light chain editing fuels BCR diversity and ultimate extinction in IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 models. A, Representative sIGK/L FACS analysis of IGH UND HGBCL-DH- BCL2 COH-DHL1 cells. Cell frequencies are indicated. B, Genomic PCR amplification of a segment of the IGKC gene (top) in COH-DHL1 cells, 293T cells, and PB mononuclear cells (PBMC). Amplification of the RPLP0 gene controlled for DNA input. Genomic PCR for the KDE rearrangement was performed on the same sample set (bottom). The asterisk refers to a nonspecific PCR amplification product serving as internal loading control. C, Longitudinal monitoring of IGM (IHC) and IGKC/LC (scale bar, 20 μm) and RAG1/2 (RNA-scope) expression (scale bar, 50 and 20 μm in the inset) in the HGBCL-DH- BCL2 - BCL6 case from which the COH-THL1 cell line model was established, analyzed at diagnosis (#329A) and after relapse (#329B). D, Representative IGM/IGK/IGL FACS analysis of low-passage COH-THL1 cells before (left plot) and after (middle and right plots) gating on the indicated subsets. Numbers indicate cell frequencies. E, Representative ( n = 5) sIGK/L FACS analysis of COH-THL1 bulk cultures before (left), at the time of sorting of IGH UND variants (middle) and after 2 weeks of in vitro culture (right) of the latter cells. Numbers indicate cell frequencies. F, Longitudinal tracking of sIGK/L expression of COH-THL1 cells profiled 2 weeks after consecutive rounds of FACS sorting for sBCR null cells. Note the progressive erosion of sIGK/L + cells at the expense of sIGK/L null cells. G, Normalized RAG1/2 transcript levels in IGH UND COH-DHL1 and COH-THL1 cells relative to 697 pre-B leukemia cells, measured by qRT-PCR. HEK293T cells were included as negative controls. H, Normalized RAG1/2 transcripts in FACS-purified IGH + and IGH UND COH-THL1 cells, quantified by RT-PCR. I, Quantitative measurement of RAG1/2 transcripts in the indicated HGBCL-DH- BCL2 (- BCL6 ) lymphoma lines, treated for 48 hours with the PI3Kδ/γ inhibitor duvelisib or FOXO1 inhibitor AS1842856. Transcripts are normalized to RPLP0 and represented as relative to the vehicle control set at 1 (dashed line). Data represent n = 6 ( A and D ) n = 5 ( E ), and n = 3 ( B , G , and H ) experiments.

    Article Snippet: Multiplex IF analysis on FFPE sections of HGBCL-DH- BCL2 (- BCL6 ) was performed using the MACSima platform (Miltenyi), with antibodies listed in Supplementary Table S7.

    Techniques: Amplification, Control, RNAscope, Expressing, Biomarker Discovery, In Vitro, Quantitative RT-PCR, Purification, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction

    IGH dependence and drug response of BCR null HGBCL-DH- BCL2 models. A, IGG (intracellular) and CD79B protein levels in COH-DHL1 cells upon exposure to the indicated doses of bortezomib (BTZ), assessed by flow cytometric (left) or immunoblotting (right) analyses. Protein extracts were normalized for cell number. B, Surface IGG protein abundance in COH-DHL1 cells before (CTRL) and after complementation with the indicated IGK or IGL light chain expression vectors. Surface IGG levels (MFI) were measured on surface IGK + /L + cells. C, Frequency of IGHG1 in-frame (IF) and out-of-frame (OF) CRISPR/Cas9-edited alleles amplified from genomic DNA or the productive V H -C H transcript (mRNA) of COH-DHL1 cells. Numbers above histogram bars refer to unique variant alleles. D, CD79B disruption in COH-DHL1 cells. Intracellular flow cytometric analysis for CD79B in COH-DHL1 cells before (CTRL) and after expression of representative gRNAs ( n = 3) targeting CD79B . Cells were analyzed at day 14 (t 1 ) and days 25–30 (t 2 ) after puromycin selection. Numbers within dot plot refer to frequency of cells in the CD79B + (top quadrant) and CD79B KO (bottom quadrant) gates. E, Cocultures of surface CD79B + and CD79B lo/− COH-THL1 cells were treated for 72 hours with PV, unconjugated polatuzumab (Pola), or left untreated (−), and assessed by FACS. Data represent n = 3 experiments. Numbers indicate cell frequencies in the corresponding quadrants. F, Surface CD79B levels (MFI) quantified by flow cytometry in HGBCL-DH- BCL2 lines. IGH + COH-THL1 cells were separated into three subsets according to IG light chain usage. DLBCL HT and Burkitt lymphoma RAMOS cells were included as negative and positive controls, respectively. G, Fraction of viable cells for the indicated HGBCL-DH- BCL2 (- BCL6 ) cell lines after 48 hours of treatment with PV (gray bars) or polatuzumab (blue bars). RAMOS and HT cell lines were included as positive and negative controls, respectively. Surface BCR (measured by IGK/L expression) and CD79B status for each line is indicated below the histogram plots. H, IC 50 concentrations for the indicated drugs in IGH UND COH-DHL1 and COH-THL1 cell lines. Drugs were grouped according to the mechanism of action or target. The NAMPT-specific inhibitor OT-82 (labeled in red) showed 100% and 45% activity at the lowest dose (0.19 nmol/L) in COH-DHL1 and COH-THL1 cells, respectively. Data represent n = 3 ( B , E , F , and G ) or n = 2 ( A ) experiments. CTRL, control; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity.

    Journal: Blood Cancer Discovery

    Article Title: B-cell Receptor Silencing Reveals the Origin and Dependencies of High-Grade B-cell Lymphomas with MYC and BCL2 Rearrangements

    doi: 10.1158/2643-3230.BCD-25-0099

    Figure Lengend Snippet: IGH dependence and drug response of BCR null HGBCL-DH- BCL2 models. A, IGG (intracellular) and CD79B protein levels in COH-DHL1 cells upon exposure to the indicated doses of bortezomib (BTZ), assessed by flow cytometric (left) or immunoblotting (right) analyses. Protein extracts were normalized for cell number. B, Surface IGG protein abundance in COH-DHL1 cells before (CTRL) and after complementation with the indicated IGK or IGL light chain expression vectors. Surface IGG levels (MFI) were measured on surface IGK + /L + cells. C, Frequency of IGHG1 in-frame (IF) and out-of-frame (OF) CRISPR/Cas9-edited alleles amplified from genomic DNA or the productive V H -C H transcript (mRNA) of COH-DHL1 cells. Numbers above histogram bars refer to unique variant alleles. D, CD79B disruption in COH-DHL1 cells. Intracellular flow cytometric analysis for CD79B in COH-DHL1 cells before (CTRL) and after expression of representative gRNAs ( n = 3) targeting CD79B . Cells were analyzed at day 14 (t 1 ) and days 25–30 (t 2 ) after puromycin selection. Numbers within dot plot refer to frequency of cells in the CD79B + (top quadrant) and CD79B KO (bottom quadrant) gates. E, Cocultures of surface CD79B + and CD79B lo/− COH-THL1 cells were treated for 72 hours with PV, unconjugated polatuzumab (Pola), or left untreated (−), and assessed by FACS. Data represent n = 3 experiments. Numbers indicate cell frequencies in the corresponding quadrants. F, Surface CD79B levels (MFI) quantified by flow cytometry in HGBCL-DH- BCL2 lines. IGH + COH-THL1 cells were separated into three subsets according to IG light chain usage. DLBCL HT and Burkitt lymphoma RAMOS cells were included as negative and positive controls, respectively. G, Fraction of viable cells for the indicated HGBCL-DH- BCL2 (- BCL6 ) cell lines after 48 hours of treatment with PV (gray bars) or polatuzumab (blue bars). RAMOS and HT cell lines were included as positive and negative controls, respectively. Surface BCR (measured by IGK/L expression) and CD79B status for each line is indicated below the histogram plots. H, IC 50 concentrations for the indicated drugs in IGH UND COH-DHL1 and COH-THL1 cell lines. Drugs were grouped according to the mechanism of action or target. The NAMPT-specific inhibitor OT-82 (labeled in red) showed 100% and 45% activity at the lowest dose (0.19 nmol/L) in COH-DHL1 and COH-THL1 cells, respectively. Data represent n = 3 ( B , E , F , and G ) or n = 2 ( A ) experiments. CTRL, control; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity.

    Article Snippet: Multiplex IF analysis on FFPE sections of HGBCL-DH- BCL2 (- BCL6 ) was performed using the MACSima platform (Miltenyi), with antibodies listed in Supplementary Table S7.

    Techniques: Western Blot, Quantitative Proteomics, Expressing, CRISPR, Amplification, Variant Assay, Disruption, Selection, Flow Cytometry, Labeling, Activity Assay, Control, Fluorescence

    FIGURE 3 | Differential localisation and distribution profile among TFH cell subsets. (A) Representative fluorescent images showing the expres- sion of CD20 (red), Ki67 (magenta) and Bcl6 (grey) in tonsillar follicles (scale bar: 300 μm). (B) 2D plots showing the expression of Ki67 vs. Bcl6 in total follicular (F) area from one tonsil and the corresponding localisation of F-CD20hi/dimCD3loKi67loBCl6lo (blue-MZ), F-CD20hi/dimCD3loKi67hiBCl6hi (magenta-DZ) and F-CD20hi/dimCD3loKi67loBCl6hi (grey-LZ) (left). The relevant B cell subsets and their localisation for one representative follicle are also shown (right). (C) 2D plots showing the gating for the identification of B subsets (based on the expression of Ki67 and Bcl6) and CD3hiPD1hi TFH cell subsets (based on the expression of CD57, CXCR3, TIGIT and Bcl6) as well as their localisation across the areas of individual follicles (data from one LN). (D) Dot plot graphs showing accumulated data for the analysis of the minimum distance between DZ (CD20hi/dimCD3loKi67hiBcl- 6hi) (open and blue circles) or LZ (CD20hi/dimCD3loKi67loBcl6hi) (green and red circles) B cells and TFH cell subsets (CD3hiPD1hiCD57loCXCR3hi, CD3hiPD1hiCD57hiCXCR3lo) (upper panel) and the corresponding calculated cross-G function (lower panel). Follicular areas from two tonsils and two LNs were analysed, each dot represents a follicle. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon and Mann–Whitney tests, and p values are listed.

    Journal: Immunology

    Article Title: Delineation of the Human Germinal Centre Immune Landscape Using Multiplex Imaging Analysis.

    doi: 10.1111/imm.13955

    Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 3 | Differential localisation and distribution profile among TFH cell subsets. (A) Representative fluorescent images showing the expres- sion of CD20 (red), Ki67 (magenta) and Bcl6 (grey) in tonsillar follicles (scale bar: 300 μm). (B) 2D plots showing the expression of Ki67 vs. Bcl6 in total follicular (F) area from one tonsil and the corresponding localisation of F-CD20hi/dimCD3loKi67loBCl6lo (blue-MZ), F-CD20hi/dimCD3loKi67hiBCl6hi (magenta-DZ) and F-CD20hi/dimCD3loKi67loBCl6hi (grey-LZ) (left). The relevant B cell subsets and their localisation for one representative follicle are also shown (right). (C) 2D plots showing the gating for the identification of B subsets (based on the expression of Ki67 and Bcl6) and CD3hiPD1hi TFH cell subsets (based on the expression of CD57, CXCR3, TIGIT and Bcl6) as well as their localisation across the areas of individual follicles (data from one LN). (D) Dot plot graphs showing accumulated data for the analysis of the minimum distance between DZ (CD20hi/dimCD3loKi67hiBcl- 6hi) (open and blue circles) or LZ (CD20hi/dimCD3loKi67loBcl6hi) (green and red circles) B cells and TFH cell subsets (CD3hiPD1hiCD57loCXCR3hi, CD3hiPD1hiCD57hiCXCR3lo) (upper panel) and the corresponding calculated cross-G function (lower panel). Follicular areas from two tonsils and two LNs were analysed, each dot represents a follicle. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon and Mann–Whitney tests, and p values are listed.

    Article Snippet: Amount Anti- PE 145Nd PE001 Standard Biotools 3145006B 2 μL GATA- 3 146Nd TWAJ ThermoFisher 14- 9966- 82 1 μL Tbet 161Dy 4B10 Standard Biotools 3161014B 2 μL Bcl6 163Dy K112- 91 Standard Biotools 3163012B 2 μL Ki67 168Tm Ki- 67 Standard Biotools 3168001B 1.4 μL Blimp1 169Tm 646702 Bio- Techne MAB36081 3 μL Granzyme B 171Yb GB11 Standard Biotools 3171002B 2 μL Bcl2 173Yb 100 BioLegend 658702 2 μL 13652567, 0, D ow nloaded from https://onlinelibrary.w iley.com /doi/10.1111/im m .13955 by N at Prov Indonesia, W iley O nline L ibrary on [29/05/2025].

    Techniques: Expressing, MANN-WHITNEY